
Chelimo speaking in 2009 ”My family haven’t been able to grow any food this year”
I’m currently in London where I’ve been attending the Annual Meeting of ActionAid’s International Emergencies and Conflict Team. In addition to reviewing how ActionAid responds to emergencies, particularly red alert emergencies such as Haiti, we have also been looking at some of the big challenges that face ActionAid such as climate change and how we work in conflict zones where we aim to do no harm and to maximise good. So to climate change which ties in nicely to last weeks policy dialogue in Canberra which was a joint effort with the ANU’s Asia Pacific College of Diplomacy and ActionAid and moderated by Ben Eltham from New Matilda. A big thanks to Ben and the gang at New Matilda for getting involved and doing such a great job!!
The dialogue centred on the impact of the Copenhagen Climate Change Talks on the world’s poor and we had a diverse crowd of students, NGOs, Academics and Government listening to a conversation between Lorraine Elliott from ANU, Maryjean Watt from the Department of Climate Change and ActionAid’s Country Director from Vietnam, Mr Phan van Ngoc who travelled from Vietnam especially for the event. This is the first of four such events that we’re going to be running through the year at ANU with forthcoming sessions focusing on the Global Food Crisis, the Millennium Development Goals (MDG’s) and the links between development, diplomacy and defence.
So what did I get out of this dialogue….From ActionAids’ perspective Copenhagen can be viewed as a partial failure as its better that there was no deal in Copenhagen rather than a weak deal. In our opinion the Copenhagen Accord is no deal and is simply an Accord developed by the rich for the rich. This Accord was “noted” at COP15 rather than “endorsed” or even “welcomed” (which are all wonderful diplomatic terms) and this means that the Copenhagen Accord has no status whatsoever outside of the select few countries that developed it and then agreed to it.
In contrast the emergence of the BASIC (Brazil,/South Africa/India/China ) group at Copenhagen will have profound implications for international relations and it was noted that the lack of a bad deal was in some way due to the power and influence of this group. The hopes of the world’s poor may be vested in the ability of the BASIC group to lead the international community towards a just outcome at talks throughout 2010 which will culminate in Mexico towards the end of the year.
This was a great way to kick off our first policy dialogue and we certainly are looking forward to round two in May which will focus on the Global Food Crisis.